HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805A
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '18 at 15:29
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A8-8650B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 112
48% 78 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 168
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 19.9
18% 19.5 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK128MBF-1AN1ZABHA 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M60A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 466
Write 151
Mixed 233
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 12.6
88% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 14
29% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback