Medion MS-7797

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMedion MS-7797  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7797
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 22:38
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 107
2-Core 205
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 515
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1578 MHz, MLim: 1927 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 64.2
59% 69.7 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 61.8
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
427GB free
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 259
Write 179
Mixed 183
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 19.8
68% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 45.8
64% 120 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 407
Mixed 416
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 40.8
120% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 85.2
91% 153 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
296GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 178
Write 128
Mixed 161
118% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.24
80% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
630GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 92.6
Write 91.4
Mixed 65.2
104% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.2
67% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 44%
WDC WD50 00LPVT-22G33T0 500GB
338GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 37
Write 39.3
Mixed 34.8
48% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.19
80% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7797 Builds (Compare 432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7797

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback