| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HP4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130712 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | May 31 '18 at 22:06 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 71% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.5%
Good
|
69% 120 Pts
|
45% 339 Pts
|
24% 379 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
|
32%
Below average
|
33% 36.2 fps
|
31% 37.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
28.3%
Poor
|
22% 106 MB/s
|
46% 13.5 MB/s
|
29% 69.4 MB/s
|
|
|
64.5%
Good
|
85% 113 MB/s
|
63% 0.69 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 029E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.1%
Below average
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
47% 84.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-HP4 Builds (Compare 34 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HP4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 8x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 6x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 8x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $312 |