Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '18 at 22:44
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 217
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 412
55% 411 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
AMD(1002 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
40.8% Average
Lighting 53.4
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 70.6
44% 53.2 fps
MRender 33.1
Gravity 51.9
Splatting 44
36% 43 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 381
Write 219
Mixed 244
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 16.8
66% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 41.9
61% 117 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 108%
GST1176 USB Flash Disk 16GB
12GB free, PID 1176
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 22.4
Mixed 10.4
26% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.81
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.22
39% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 29.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback