Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '18 at 21:33
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 121
56% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 414
38% 320 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
PowerColor(148C 2336) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 46.3
32% 40 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 39.1
28% 33.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 520ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 271
Write 202
Mixed 209
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 14
85% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.3
DQ Write 77.5
DQ Mixed 14.8
23% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
484GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 116
Write 142
Mixed 77.8
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.2
78% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
50GB free
Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 61.5
Mixed 19.6
34% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.41
91% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1600 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback