Lenovo 4382

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4382  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Guam
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '18 at 05:22
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P340-$50
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Memory 17.7
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 33.8
15% 24.4 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 50
5% 42.9 Pts
64-Core 48
3% 48 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Legend(17AA 3949) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.16
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0010LVM1 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 66.3
Mixed 64.4
49% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.33
71% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 39%
IS917 EZ 16GB
1GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 15.1
Mixed 5.28
17% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.03
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.47
61% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 31%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB
0GB free, PID 0158
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 12.5
Mixed 11.7
17% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.28
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 1.23
76% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.1
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 338
12% 338 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4382 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 4382

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback