Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro12,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E43C1C25D4880AD6
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 19:33
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5557U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 192
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 289
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 013F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 9.5
8% 9.88 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 12
8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM1024G PCIe 1TB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW1SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 939
Mixed 1,152
260% 1,174 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 16.3
71% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 10.1
56% 126 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 144%
Great: 209%
APPLE SD Card Reader 256GB
212GB free, PID 8406
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 79.9
Write 74.1
Mixed 68
94% 74 MB/s
4K Read 4.96
4K Write 3.45
4K Mixed 2.49
220% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4544464232333241314D412D4A442D46 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro12,1 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro12,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback