Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Processor model unknown 218 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	34% Below average	Memory 56.6 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 70.8 35% 55 Pts	4-Core 68.1 8-Core 69.8 9% 68.9 Pts	64-Core 67.8 4% 67.8 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 840D) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.99% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.48 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 2.09 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.99% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.3% Poor	Read 127 Write 75.1 Mixed 82.5 21% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 11.3 59% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 24 DQ Mixed 11 12% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 99GB free Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.3% Poor	Read 112 Write 74.7 Mixed 82 20% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 11.4 60% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.7 DQ Write 42.5 DQ Mixed 11.3 15% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 118%
M4-CT128 M4SSD2 128GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 105GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 32.6 Write 30.6 Mixed 30.5 40% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.12 4K Write 6.12 4K Mixed 3.37 346% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 157%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 6100NvidiaBench 0%, 335 samples	1x

SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16