Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-UP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88X-UP4  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 18:06
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 75
42% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 76
8-Core 79.8
10% 77.9 Pts
64-Core 82.3
5% 82.3 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
XFX(1682 9270) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver:
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 26.6
22% 26 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 33.7
24% 28.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 485
Write 375
Mixed 399
93% 420 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 30.7
108% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 48.3
52% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
212GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 129
Write 108
Mixed 118
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.26
87% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 109%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 10.2
Mixed 7.13
14% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.81
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.009
11% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 08G-D3-1600-M 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.6
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88X-UP4 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-UP4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback