Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '18 at 12:29
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 145
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 241
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Sapphire(174B E253) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 36.8
23% 32.2 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 25
Splatting 33.4
24% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900212 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 290
Write 414
Mixed 421
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 5.84
77% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 5.82
16% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
66GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 95.5
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.55
99% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
46GB free
Firmware: GT001H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 61.7
Mixed 61.4
46% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.15
37% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
41GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 65.8
Mixed 56.3
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.26
69% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
469GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 91.7
Write 90.2
Mixed 87.9
116% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.2
64% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/2 KHX1600C9D3/2 KHX1600C9D3/2 KHX1600C9D3/2 8GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback