QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '18 at 09:55
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$195
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 240
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 809
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 1022
63% 1022 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 151
Parallax 140
108% 141 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 146
Splatting 105
98% 121 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 250GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 499
Mixed 513
114% 510 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 26.9
104% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 112
126% 215 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 95%
Red Hat VirtIO 250GB
86GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: UDMA 44 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.7% Very poor
Read 197
Write 144
Mixed 182
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.55
3% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 66.4
MC Mixed 30.3
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback