Gigabyte GA-H67N-USB3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67N-USB3-B3  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 06 '18 at 21:58
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 470
52% 411 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
62.6% Good
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 82.3
Parallax 78.3
65% 80.2 fps
MRender 75.5
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 65.3
58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF180A5L 180GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LTVi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 457
Write 152
Mixed 223
61% 278 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 14.9
69% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 48.2
76% 147 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
28GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62% Good
Read 266
Write 169
Mixed 194
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 31.4
106% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 91
92% 151 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62%
Great: 124%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 101
Write 112
Mixed 99.9
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.2
92% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
109GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 96.4
Write 68.7
Mixed 70.3
59% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.17
74% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 67%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 32GB
7GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 16.9
Mixed 8.69
21% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.68
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.8
89% 3.15 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H67N-USB3-B3 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67N-USB3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback