Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '18 at 16:19
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 131
61% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 209
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Gigabyte(1458 21D8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.71 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2
1% 1.64 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 323
Write 107
Mixed 162
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 17
98% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 96.5
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 50.4
57% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 80%
Samsung Spinpoint MP4 2.5" 500GB
375GB free
Firmware: 2AK1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 87
Write 83.3
Mixed 79.9
63% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.26
66% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 58%
USB DISK 30X 1GB
0GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.6% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 5.35
Mixed 6.1
8% 7.31 MB/s
4K Read 3.67
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
15% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 15.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback