Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 03 '18 at 16:29
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 663
61% 511 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Nvidia(10DE 0648) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 0.88
2% 2.12 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 2.52
2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$110
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,713
Write 590
Mixed 721
220% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 29.9
134% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 18.9
58% 128 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 153%
Great: 215%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
358GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 141
Write 145
Mixed 128
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.24
88% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82%
Great: 113%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
130GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 126
Write 130
Mixed 122
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.31
83% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 74%
Adata Classic C802 USB 2.0 16GB
2GB free, PID c82a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
9.19% Terrible
Read 26.9
Write 15.7
Mixed 16.7
23% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
30% 2.55 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback