Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Memory 45.2 1-Core 24.6 2-Core 46 26% 38.6 Pts	4-Core 82.7 8-Core 119 13% 101 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Dell(1028 07BE) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9065 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	25% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 24.9 Parallax 29.4 27% 29 fps	MRender 25.9 Gravity 32.2 Splatting 22.8 22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 25%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY74D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 2,192 Write 1,120 Mixed 1,449 350% 1,587 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 13.6 69% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 39 DQ Mixed 12.8 16% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 259%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KMKYF9-MIH 2x8GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 18.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,602x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,418x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	6x

SSD
THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 122%, 19,561 samples	492x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	479x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	286x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	1,181x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBHynixBench 73%, 6,356 samples	266x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 2x8GBMicronBench 67%, 2,004 samples	237x

Total price: $1,300