Asrock P43Twins1600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock P43Twins1600  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091201
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 05 '16 at 17:18
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 53.8
37% 52 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 97.7
14% 100 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Gainward(10B0 0401) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 3.31
8% 7.48 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.26
6% 7.15 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
935GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 85.9
Write 78.9
Mixed 21.5
45% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.17
80% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 67%
ST332062 0A 320GB
293GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 29.2
Mixed 19.1
33% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.31
52% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P43Twins1600 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P43Twins1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback