Dell Latitude E6420

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Latitude E6420  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0P6K8J
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '16 at 22:33
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 141
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 199
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Dell(1028 0493) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.54
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.52 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.43
3% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723232A7A365 320GB
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EC2OA80G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 103
Mixed 96.6
75% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.32
82% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%
ST925041 0AS 250GB
146GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 20.6
Mixed 23.6
30% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.08
21% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6420 Builds (Compare 2,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback