Intel NUC7i3BNB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemIntel NUC7i3BNHXF
MotherboardIntel NUC7i3BNB  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '18 at 17:44
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 209
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4735
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 6.06
5% 7.32 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 14
8% 8.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+931GBHDD 1TB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.7 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 92%
IS917 innostor 125GB
50GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.9% Poor
Read 107
Write 38.7
Mixed 30.3
60% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.56
64% 3.79 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P24HC4U1-B5QS 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (83rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i3BNB Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i3BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback