HP 202 G2 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP 202 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B1E
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141013
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 09 '18 at 09:24
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 196
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 289
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2B1E) 1,017MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3368
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 4.34
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.65
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 90.6
Mixed 93
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.38
69% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425U6AFR6A-PB 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 202 G2 MT Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 202 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback