Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '18 at 05:47
Run Duration	433 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	44% Average	Memory 63.4 1-Core 27.1 2-Core 46.3 32% 45.6 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 369 28% 251 Pts	64-Core 571 35% 571 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.83 1% 0.91 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2701 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2359 (B1) Unknown 98 98 36 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 54 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 478 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1050 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7538220696	57.9% Above average	Read 264 Write 210 Mixed 217 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 22.3 97% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 71.2 DQ Mixed 46.1 54% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 91 16661608 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2261 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2459499 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2089 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 933 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 58 605814813 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 245 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6223 (C2) HDA temperature 29 42 64424509469 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -29635274342079 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3888252621 (F2) Unknown 100 253 13843383342	76.2% Very good	Read 134 Write 132 Mixed 129 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.23 88% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 114%
Seagate BUP Slim WH 2TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 120 Write 129 Mixed 72.8 134% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.35 82% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB 3,351 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 55GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	5.57% Terrible	Read 20 Write 6.28 Mixed 7.45 12% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.47 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.01 21% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.57% Great: 32%
EKMEMORY USB 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 5GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.48% Terrible	Read 33.6 Write 9.12 Mixed 13.3 19% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 42% 3.61 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.48% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 11,003 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 7.4 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	175x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	165x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	101x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	134x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	75x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	89x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	23x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383