Today's hottest deals

HP xw6400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP xw6400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A04h
Memory11.5 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateApr 07 '18 at 01:37
Run Duration501 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5335
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 23
2-Core 45.8
33% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 91.9
8-Core 182
16% 137 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 285
Nvidia(10DE 0334) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.8
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.07% Terrible
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.07%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Volume1 750GB
353GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 64
Write 62.4
Mixed 31.2
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.75
4K Mixed 0.31
73% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 88%
Lexar CFUDMASD 4GB
4GB free, PID b035
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.66% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 16.3
Mixed 17.4
22% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.48
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.12
25% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback