Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100521
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '18 at 02:38
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 94
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 153
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 285
32% 254 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
PNY(196E 0898) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 24
Parallax 18.4
16% 20.9 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 21.7
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.5% Below average
Read 177
Write 135
Mixed 145
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 9.79
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 14
49% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 11.7
19% 35 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 94%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0103
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 29.2
Mixed 31.2
24% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.56
119% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 85%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0103
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 13.6
Mixed 19.3
17% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.24
74% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 94%
ST332082 0AS 320GB
209GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 24.9
Mixed 27
34% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.34
47% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 3.1
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback