Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141007
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '18 at 12:19
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 159 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 462 47% 378 Pts	64-Core 560 35% 560 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4612 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2166 (B1) Unknown 98 98 21 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 316 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15045330500	80.5% Excellent	Read 504 Write 350 Mixed 352 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 19.5 116% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 19.8 42% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 89GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 72 63 20313243 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1288 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 19015933 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1822 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 887 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 85 85 15 (BE) vendor-specific 71 64 487653405 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1318 (C2) HDA temperature 29 13 55834574877 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 3 1 20313243 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 110466558854794 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13947064906 (F2) Unknown 100 253 12303654936	80.1% Excellent	Read 132 Write 147 Mixed 133 104% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.25 73% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C9 8x4GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 44.2 MC Mixed 37.1 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

CPU
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	287x
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	200x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	190x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	61x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	58x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	47x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	22x

RAM
DDR3 1866 4x4GBAdataBench 68%, 420 samples	24x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 738 samples	17x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $948

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353