Asus N751JK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus N751JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N751JK
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140722
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '18 at 20:06
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 438
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 17BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 6.88
3% 8.85 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 7.57
5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 129
Write 123
Mixed 129
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 75%
Kobo eReader-4.5.9587 1GB
1GB free, PID 4163
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.04% Terrible
Read 2.98
Write 2.76
Mixed 5.25
5% 3.66 MB/s
4K Read 1.26
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.55
54% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N751JK Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N751JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback