Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA770-UD3  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '18 at 00:58
Run Duration571 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7750
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 75
42% 62.4 Pts
4-Core 79.7
8-Core 74.9
10% 77.3 Pts
64-Core 74
5% 74 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS
Nvidia(10DE 0420) 320MB
Ram: 320MB, Driver: 341.92
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 1.94
4% 4.79 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5
4% 5.08 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
640GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 84.4
Mixed 5.31
45% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.18
42% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
16GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 46.3
Write 44.3
Mixed 38.4
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.32
94% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 61%
Leef iBRIDGE 64GB
34GB free, PID 2aab
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Read 10.9
Write 3.25
Mixed 4.91
7% 6.37 MB/s
4K Read 0.003
4K Write 0.001
4K Mixed 0.001
0% 0.002 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 8.6
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.8
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA770-UD3 Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback