Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130326
Uptime14.2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '16 at 20:32
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$203
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 77.6
46% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 169
19% 151 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 28.3
27% 31.2 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 29.7
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 226
Mixed 159
149% 200 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.13
92% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 126%
Great: 109%
RIM SD 2GB
2GB free, PID 8014
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.12% Terrible
Read 9.21
Write 5.31
Mixed 4.73
7% 6.42 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.02
9% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback