Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170523
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 18 '18 at 18:58
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 450
60% 450 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Lighting 7.73
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 7.84
6% 9.01 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 15.8
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 492
Write 371
Mixed 344
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 4.54
60% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 2
38% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 78%
ST932042 3AS 320GB
218GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 81
Write 80.4
Mixed 78.7
103% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.41
65% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FDD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback