Asus P5QPL-AM

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5QPL-AM (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100129
Uptime	8.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '18 at 15:14
Run Duration	296 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad-$90 5,765 User benchmarks, average bench 43% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 54.5 35% 50.2 Pts	4-Core 88.3 8-Core 102 12% 95.1 Pts	64-Core 105 6% 105 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31% Below average	Lighting 28.6 Reflection 51.9 Parallax 66.5 23% 49 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 44.8 Splatting 55.8 46% 56.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 335 Series 240GB-$219 4,220 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 335u Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8916352145268 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 65 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 39 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 551590 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 551590 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2651236 (F9) Unknown 100 100 25390	40.8% Average	Read 186 Write 195 Mixed 184 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 11 66% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 30.8 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 11.4 19% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 92%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 59GB free Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -89756225611225 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 79 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 79 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 79 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 132216 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 72 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 132216 (F2) Unknown 100 100 353210 (F9) Unknown 100 100 6717	43.1% Average	Read 184 Write 191 Mixed 179 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 13.2 75% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 32.3 DQ Write 64.9 DQ Mixed 13.9 20% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 95%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 600GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 59.3 Write 46.6 Mixed 37.3 36% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.26 85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 51%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 559GB free, PID null Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 28 Write 26.3 Mixed 23.1 33% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.29 46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 71%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 219GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 27 Mixed 25.4 35% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.27 82% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 59%
WDC WD10EFRX-68PJCN0 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 192GB free, PID 1e40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.8% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 26.8 Mixed 26.5 35% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.22 80% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QPL-AM Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QPL-AM

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	23x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	15x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	13x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	46x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	9x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
CS900 120GBPNY $15Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	144x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	14x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $137

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16