EVGA E689

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardEVGA E689  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 17:27
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 175
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 288
34% 261 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 57.8
Reflection 65
Parallax 71.2
47% 64.7 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 53.2
46% 56.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 456
Write 105
Mixed 158
52% 240 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 13.5
81% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 35.3
54% 103 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 81%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
468GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 70.4
Write 82.3
Mixed 123
71% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 67%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
197GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 155
Mixed 103
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.2
99% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 108%
TDK LoR TF10 16GB
0GB free, PID 07f0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 5.89
Mixed 7.98
11% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.39
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
13% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GBH2X02E99924-165 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E689 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: EVGA E689

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $598
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback