Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 103 53% 82 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 152 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 410M 4,608 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 908B) 1GB CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.93 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 1.53 2% 1.89 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 5 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 25 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 62 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 319997363	80.3% Excellent	Read 490 Write 400 Mixed 216 82% 369 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 26.6 95% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 60.1 72% 125 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ext SSD 240GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3GB free, PID 5589 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 27.8 Write 21.4 Mixed 23.1 30% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.33 4K Write 4.24 4K Mixed 1.6 219% 3.72 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.9 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM