Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 430 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 430 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1946
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 06 '18 at 20:52
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 87.7
47% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 114
17% 122 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1946) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3324
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 4.72
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.39
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 371
Write 85.4
Mixed 146
43% 201 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 15
87% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 35.5
64% 128 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 89%
IVR37616 innovera 16GB
14GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.34% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 3.05
Mixed 4.9
8% 8.76 MB/s
4K Read 4.21
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.004
16% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F 1315 CT51264BF160B.M16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 430 G1 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 430 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback