IBM 622364G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemIBM 622364G  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM MSI-9151 Boards
Memory4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '18 at 23:02
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz
CPU#1 , 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 58.5
33% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 83.2
8-Core 83.7
11% 83.4 Pts
64-Core 83.4
5% 83.4 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX
Gigabyte(1458 3439) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.44
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.41
1% 1.34 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 2.52
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GF100-07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 57.8
Mixed 35.8
37% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.31
72% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x1GB
6 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback