Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateMar 04 '18 at 14:38
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 122
56% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
XFX(1682 5230) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.02 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 481
Write 183
Mixed 320
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 4.79
67% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 5.86
12% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 80.2
72% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.57
125% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 61%
WD WD1000FYPS-01ZKB0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 75.2
Write 73.2
Mixed 21
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.33
99% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 44%
Intenso Basic Line 4GB
2GB free, PID 800b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 7.2
Mixed 8.47
11% 9.79 MB/s
4K Read 4.37
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.005
17% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team--Elite-1333 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 15.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.4
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback