Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion KE479AA-ABD a6345.de

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion KE479AA-ABD a6345.de  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NARRA2
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '18 at 16:58
Run Duration605 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 87.4
45% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 89.4
8-Core 87
12% 88.2 Pts
64-Core 89.9
6% 89.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8576) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.38
4% 4.45 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
886GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 195
Mixed 188
145% 193 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.24
101% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Laufwerk 250GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WDC WD25 00BEVT-60ZCT1 250GB
176GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 21.2
Mixed 20.7
27% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 20%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Read 9.79
Write 2.39
Mixed 1.05
4% 4.41 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
5% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback