Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160329
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '18 at 17:27
Run Duration	397 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 76.2 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 134 56% 93 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 355 38% 300 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.8% Very good	Lighting 85 Reflection 116 Parallax 103 69% 102 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 101 Splatting 87.9 77% 94.4 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 177281786 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 -131709467077895 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2832 (AB) Unknown 0 0 1 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 2001 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 1 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 41 66 47248965673 (C2) HDA temperature 41 66 47248965673 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 177281786 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 177281786 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 177281786 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 26416 (EA) Unknown 0 0 24917 (F1) Unknown 0 0 24917 (F2) Unknown 0 0 29829	34.7% Below average	Read 138 Write 86.2 Mixed 99.4 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 10.4 68% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 97.7 DQ Write 92.6 DQ Mixed 24.9 38% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 73%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148 4,794 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 464GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 87 78 192032822 (03) Spinup time 99 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8555 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 25877020576 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 35236 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 10059 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 362 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 30 22483828787 (C2) HDA temperature 51 70 51539607603 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 47 45 212420977 (C5) Current pending sector count 99 97 24 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 99 97 24 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 197 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 91 244 9	30.4% Below average	Read 57.4 Write 48.3 Mixed 62 42% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.41 85% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 37%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 199GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 144 144 34387657076 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 139 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1440 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 139 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 151 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 151 (C2) HDA temperature 117 117 270583660595 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	83.4% Excellent	Read 149 Write 142 Mixed 159 114% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.22 84% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS541680J9AT00 80GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 5GB free Firmware: SB2IA73H Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 106 106 4521 (03) Spinup time 159 159 85899345922 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1531 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 36 (09) Power-on hours count 12 12 38818 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1193 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2404319476 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1694838 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 231928561706 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	2.39% Terrible	Read 3.91 Write 3.95 Mixed 3.9 3% 3.92 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.23 63% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.39% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 2,517 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.1% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 14.1 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	48x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	27x
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	4x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 10 samples	4x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 58%, 5,634 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $642

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359