Today's hottest deals

MSI FM2-A85XA-G43 (MS-7793)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7793
MotherboardMSI FM2-A85XA-G43 (MS-7793)  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '18 at 15:15
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 80.5
47% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 84.4
8-Core 77.8
11% 81.1 Pts
64-Core 84.9
5% 84.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.3% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 68
Parallax 95.4
32% 67.5 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 56.3
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 86.1
Write 66.4
Mixed 70.4
56% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.44
107% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix DMT451E6BFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A85XA-G43 (MS-7793) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A85XA-G43 (MS-7793)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback