Gigabyte GA-H110M-M2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-M.2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-M2-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '18 at 22:28
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$62 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 94.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 217 84% 145 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 345 46% 345 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$88 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6150) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 24.3 Parallax 24.8 27% 27.3 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 31.6 Splatting 31 27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 164825921 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 94927367187047 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1282 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 284 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 36 49 81607589924 (C2) HDA temperature 36 49 81607589924 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 164825921 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 164825921 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 164825921 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 21474836480 (E9) Unknown 0 0 21261 (EA) Unknown 0 0 21070 (F1) Unknown 0 0 21070 (F2) Unknown 0 0 44941 (F4) Unknown 94 94 11927734	50.3% Above average	Read 437 Write 112 Mixed 140 50% 230 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 6.47 76% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 83.7 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 30 43% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 75%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 864GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 61 708 (03) Spinup time 83 83 6050 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 5932 (05) Reallocated sector count 98 98 50 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 40986 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5308 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 63 683 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 1 1 300 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 19128 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 58 555352097 (C2) HDA temperature 67 55 588906529 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 7885884 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 50 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 84 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 191 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 3 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	54.6% Above average	Read 91.9 Write 98.5 Mixed 88.9 70% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.31 72% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 59%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 574GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.6% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 4.57 Mixed 9.5 13% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.29 35% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.6% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 11.4 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.4 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-M2-CF Builds (Compare 368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-M2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	120x
Core i3-7100Intel $62Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	43x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	41x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	8x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $176

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16