Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP270E5E-K08FR
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '16 at 13:47
Run Duration349 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
22% Poor
Memory 40.2
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 20.1
21% 27.9 Pts
4-Core 24.1
8-Core 25.9
3% 25 Pts
64-Core 21.8
1% 21.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.72
1% 0.84 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 471
Write 251
Mixed 269
73% 331 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 11.2
54% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 54.2
DQ Write 18.6
DQ Mixed 15.1
17% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52%
Great: 91%
ST310003 33AS 1TB
170GB free, PID 0951
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 25.8
Mixed 28.3
36% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.41
72% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 20%
Multiple Card Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 5.1
Mixed 7.07
10% 8.82 MB/s
4K Read 1.51
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
7% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 6.2
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.8
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback