Asus P7H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H55  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '18 at 17:37
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 132
58% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 202
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 14.8
14% 15.3 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 17.3
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow SNV Series 64GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C091126a Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 214
Write 95.2
Mixed 70.6
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 8.01
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 4.77
27% 9.68 MB/s
DQ Read 10.5
DQ Write 9.09
DQ Mixed 3.77
4% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 28%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
160GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 57.9
Mixed 51.8
43% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.27
68% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 47%
KINGSTON SV300S37A240G 240GB
197GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 35.2
Write 29.1
Mixed 31.4
40% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.73
4K Write 7.62
4K Mixed 4.96
456% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 14
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55 Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback