Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '18 at 01:29
Run Duration666 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 443
60% 444 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
70GB free
Firmware: 5.0.2a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.5% Above average
Read 201
Write 162
Mixed 133
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 14.7
91% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 44
71% 136 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 89%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 35GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
70GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 43%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 69GB
44GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 2GB
2GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 22% Great: 33%
WD My Passport 2TB
312GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 81.3
Mixed 61.8
94% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.16
60% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
121GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 7.5
Mixed 11.2
17% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.23
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 30%
Netac MobileDataStar 127GB
48GB free, PID b600
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
186% Outstanding
Read 309
Write 305
Mixed 294
389% 303 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 13.1
1,294% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 32.3
DQ Mixed 13.1
1,623% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 186%
Great: 244%
Netac MobileDataStar 127GB
46GB free, PID b600
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
186% Outstanding
Read 310
Write 300
Mixed 295
387% 301 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 12.9
1,294% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 33.1
DQ Mixed 13.1
1,650% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 186%
Great: 244%
ST350064 1A 500GB
28GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 17%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
6GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.98% Terrible
Read 23.8
Write 12.1
Mixed 12
18% 16 MB/s
4K Read 4.47
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.58
68% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $851
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback