ECS MCP61M-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS MCP61M-M3  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '16 at 21:54
Run Duration1136 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 45.6
34% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 48.8
8-Core 51.3
7% 50 Pts
64-Core 60.9
4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Device(105B 0F2E) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 1.84
5% 5.2 fps
MRender 8.86
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.74
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2O
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 83.4
Mixed 105
71% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.38
82% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$19
24GB free
Firmware: 11.0
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
28% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 45.7
Mixed 51.2
37% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.29
86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28%
Great: 36%
WD WD1600BB-22GUC0 160GB
16GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 35.8
Write 40.2
Mixed 33.5
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.13
66% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 32%
SAMSUNG File-Stor Gadget 12GB
11GB free, PID 685b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Read 1.01
Write 0.95
Mixed 0.97
1% 0.98 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.25
4K Mixed 0.33
22% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair VS2GB1333D4 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MCP61M-M3 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS MCP61M-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback