Today's hottest deals

IBM 8194MGL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows XP is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (2.5GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIBM 8194MGL  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM IBM
Memory0.6 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit цв.
OSWindows XP
BIOS Date20040830
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '14 at 06:30
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2.53GHz
WMT478/NWD, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1-Core 22
2-Core 21.9
11% 22 Pts
4-Core 22.3
8-Core 24
3% 23.1 Pts
64-Core 23.5
2% 23.5 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6E040L0 41GB-$27
6GB free
Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 45.1
Write 38.5
Mixed 26.6
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.19
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.25
55% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24%
Great: 32%
Lexar JumpDrive Triton USB 3.0 32GB-$72
15GB free, PID a203
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 23.3
Mixed 15.4
27% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.12
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.04
16% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 58%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback