Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '18 at 21:18
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 379
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 207
Parallax 199
140% 193 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 182
Splatting 126
119% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 411
Mixed 419
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 40
130% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 82.9
88% 146 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 134%
ADATA NH03 2TB
879GB free, PID a03a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 163
Write 160
Mixed 128
191% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.27
52% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
E30122B 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro4 Builds (Compare 788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4 - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $550
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback