Biostar TH67B

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar TH67B (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110530
Uptime	15.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '18 at 15:16
Run Duration	459 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 171 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 308 41% 306 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Biostar(1565 110D) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.16 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB 1,160 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 116GB free Firmware: 1.5.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 5 0 5 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18263 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2936 (E8) Unknown 100 100 23120774039 (E9) Unknown 97 0 97	51.7% Above average	Read 241 Write 279 Mixed 278 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 12 75% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 11.3 26% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 81%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 170 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 131072 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 48014 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 582 (AA) Unknown 100 100 64 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 2 (AD) Unknown 55 55 15076 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (B5) Unknown 100 100 7404586926837 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 359 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 8103 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 64 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 55 55 301 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0
Poor: 41% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 84GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 105952236 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 64 64 37477 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4987994 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 38109 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 596 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 17180131332 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 51 621936671 (C2) HDA temperature 31 49 42949672991 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 15 105952236 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 91083371476852 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1572055502 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1052988015	30.5% Below average	Read 59.2 Write 46.9 Mixed 43.7 37% 49.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.34 76% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 70%
hp v250w 8GB 206 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID ae07 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.85% Terrible	Read 26 Write 3.68 Mixed 5.73 11% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.34 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.004 20% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.85% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991770 991770 8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.8% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 8.3 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TH67B Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TH67B

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	3x
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples	2x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)Intel $15Bench 2%, 6,831 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x
XPG SX900 256GBAdata $164Bench 77%, 6,726 samples	1x

RAM
CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 R538G1601U2S R338G1339U2S 24GBCorsairBench 29%, 2 samples	2x
CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 8GBCorsairBench 47%, 277 samples	1x
F3-10666CL7-4GBRH F3-10666CL7-4GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 43%, 30 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $226

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16