Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive715% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory39.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '24 at 04:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$594
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 86.8
1-Core 202
2-Core 406
121% 231 Pts
4-Core 809
8-Core 1615
143% 1,212 Pts
64-Core 3,711
230% 3,711 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
MSI(1462 7E12) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.40.28
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
8.18% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 13.4
6% 11.5 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 21.8
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.18%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force TM8FFS002T 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 050g020U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6906 6813 6802 6954 6886 6740 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
715% Outstanding
Read 3,006
Write 6986
Mixed 3,064
SusWrite 6,850
1,136% 4,977 MB/s
4K Read 73.2
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 111
376% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,692
DQ Write 1010
DQ Mixed 1,488
1,071% 1,397 MB/s
Poor: 425%
This bench: 715%
Great: 715%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-5200J4040A24G 2x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
186% Outstanding
MC Read 101
MC Write 48.4
MC Mixed 58.3
198% 69.3 GB/s
SC Read 49.9
SC Write 54
SC Mixed 49.7
146% 51.2 GB/s
Latency 50.3
80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 186%
Great: 239%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 32" 1280 720 IPA3200 F3232K-M
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 337%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 342%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback