Asus M32CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus M32CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150828
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 20:11
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 210
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 370
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 8670) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 3.81
3% 3.86 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 5.17
4% 4.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
119GB free
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 484
Write 184
Mixed 267
68% 312 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 5.28
89% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 4.15
34% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 160
Mixed 184
126% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.17
70% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-400.A00LF 9905403-198.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 14.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback