Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 14:58
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 415
55% 412 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 5.66
5% 6.52 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 11.9
7% 7.79 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,877
Write 816
Mixed 1,056
274% 1,250 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 44.2
190% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 156
166% 279 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 197%
Great: 243%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
239GB free
Firmware: CP100-11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 71.9
Write 78.2
Mixed 79
58% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.34
91% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
159GB free
Firmware: 10.02E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 54.9
Mixed 54.6
42% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.46
109% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 35%
USB Flash Drive 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 5.07
Mixed 7.09
10% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 4.82
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
19% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $691
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback