Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics9.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 00:53
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 517
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 362B) 2GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.53% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 12.5
9% 11 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 13.7
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.53%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV425S 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 309a Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 222
Write 172
Mixed 133
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 5.28
28% 9.82 MB/s
DQ Read 10
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 4.89
6% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 381
Write 307
Mixed 222
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 30.2
103% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 106
89% 132 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback