Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82XF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82XF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231226
Uptime12.7 Days
Run DateAug 29 '24 at 04:27
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User JAM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 188
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 405
46% 358 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3CD5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4667
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 13.7
8% 13.2 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 12.2
12% 15.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPMQD-512G-1101 512GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 391 399 722 619 972 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 2,119
Write 1,362
Mixed 1,261
SusWrite 582
296% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 44.2
162% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 278
197% 256 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 181%
Great: 425%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
113% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 40.7
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 21.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 18 60 16" 1280 720 LEN9156
Typical 82XF Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82XF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback