Today's hottest deals

MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics401% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E16
MotherboardMSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)  (all builds)
Memory86.7 GB free of 96 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240704
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateAug 21 '24 at 15:34
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$597
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 215
2-Core 415
121% 235 Pts
4-Core 829
8-Core 1,590
144% 1,209 Pts
64-Core 3,646
226% 3,646 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 116%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 560.81
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
401% Outstanding
Lighting 656
Reflection 569
Parallax 711
534% 645 fps
MRender 520
Gravity 563
Splatting 298
360% 460 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 401%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,911
Write 3,820
Mixed 2441
616% 2,724 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 63.2
203% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,587
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 1,377
983% 1,274 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 530%
CT4000BX500SSD1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR081
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 514
Write 407
Mixed 406
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 24.9
124% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 36.1
85% 171 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP48G56C46U5.C16B 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
217% Outstanding
MC Read 127
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 67.8
239% 83.7 GB/s
SC Read 48.9
SC Write 60.1
SC Mixed 51.5
153% 53.5 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 148%
This bench: 217%
Great: 217%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 17% 12 215 57 60 15.9" 1280 720 DZX1580 K3
Typical X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16) Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,484
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback